[ICLR 2025] HTMuon: Beyond Orthogonality with Heavy-Tailed Spectral Correction

HTMuon: Improving Muon via Heavy-Tailed Spectral Correction

Summary
Problem
Method
Results
Takeaways
Abstract

HTMuon is a novel matrix-based optimizer for LLM pretraining and image classification that improves upon the Muon optimizer by applying a heavy-tailed spectral correction to the momentum update. It achieves state-of-the-art performance, reducing perplexity by up to 0.98 on LLaMA-135M compared to standard Muon.

TL;DR

HTMuon is a breakthrough in matrix-based optimization that fixes a critical flaw in the popular Muon optimizer: the "all-ones" singular value update. By applying a power-law correction to the momentum spectrum, HTMuon creates heavy-tailed updates that significantly improve LLM pretraining efficiency and generalization, achieving a ~1.0 PPL reduction on LLaMA models over the original Muon.

The "All-Ones" Fallacy: Why Orthogonality Isn't Enough

Recent LLM training breakthroughs (like Moonshot's Kimi K2 and GLM-4.5) have pivoted toward Muon, a matrix-based optimizer. Muon's secret sauce is its orthogonalization step: it takes the momentum matrix and forces all its singular values to be exactly 1.0.

While this stabilizes early training, the authors of HTMuon expose a hidden cost:

  1. Noise Amplification: Setting all singular values to 1 treats small, noise-dominated directions with the same "importance" as the principal signal directions.
  2. Spectral Suppression: It prevents the model from developing heavy-tailed empirical spectral density (ESD). According to Heavy-Tailed Self-Regularization (HT-SR) theory, the best-performing models naturally evolve heavy-tailed weights. By forcing a flat spectrum, Muon inadvertently limits the model's final capacity.

Methodology: The Power of

The design of HTMuon is elegant and grounded in mathematical intuition. Instead of Muon’s (which is a power of 0) or SGDM's (a power of 1), HTMuon operates in the optimal middle ground:

By choosing , the optimizer retains the matrix-based ability to capture parameter correlations while allowing the "signal" components (large singular values) to lead the update slightly more than the "noise" (small singular values).

Model Architecture and Motivation Figure: The Spectrum Comparison. Note how Muon NS implicitly outperforms Muon SVD because it fails to reach a perfectly flat spectrum, hinting that a "perfect" all-ones spectrum is actually suboptimal.

Theoretical Depth: Schatten-q Norms

The authors provide a rigorous foundation by showing that HTMuon is the explicit solution to steepest descent under a Schatten-q norm constraint. This generalizes Muon (which corresponds to Schatten-) and places HTMuon in a broader class of mathematically sound "Proximity Operators."

Experimental Results: Setting New SOTAs

The performance gains are remarkably consistent across tasks:

  1. LLaMA Pretraining: On the C4 dataset, HTMuon reduces PPL by 0.98 for 135M models.
  2. Larger Scales: In LLaMA-1B experiments, HTMuon outperforms Muon (14.17 vs 14.33 PPL).
  3. Image Classification: For ResNet-50 on CIFAR-100, HTMuon reaches 80.16% accuracy, surpassing Muon's 79.85%.

Main Results Table Table: Comparison across LLaMA scales. HTMuon shows widening leads as the model size increases.

Speed vs. Performance: The HTMuon-NS Variant

To address the computational cost of SVD, the authors introduced HTMuon-NS. By using an iterative Newton-Schulz root routine to approximate the fractional power, they achieved -power updates with only minimal overhead (approx. 6-11% additional wall-clock time), which is quickly recovered by faster convergence.

Critical Analysis & Takeaways

HTMuon represents a shift from "stability at all costs" to "stability through correct inductive bias."

Core Insights:

  • Generalization is in the Tail: The layer-wise analysis confirms that HTMuon produces models with smaller (PL exponent), meaning more heavy-tailed weights and better generalization.
  • Plug-and-Play: HTMuon can be added to other Muon variants (like NorMuon) for additive gains.
  • Limitations: While the default is robust, the computational SVD overhead is still non-zero. Future hardware-accelerated SVD or deeper Newton-Schulz optimizations will be key to making this the default for 100B+ parameter models.

In conclusion, HTMuon proves that the "shape" of our updates matters just as much as their magnitude. By respecting the natural heavy-tailed tendencies of neural networks, we can train smarter, not just longer.

Find Similar Papers

Try Our Examples

  • Search for recent papers that apply Heavy-Tailed Self-Regularization (HT-SR) theory to improve Large Language Model optimization or architectural design.
  • Which original paper established the connection between Schatten-p norm constraints and steepest descent in matrix-based optimization, and how does HTMuon extend this framework?
  • Investigate studies that compare SVD-based optimizers with Newton-Schulz iterations in terms of spectral bias and training stability for models exceeding 10B parameters.
Contents
[ICLR 2025] HTMuon: Beyond Orthogonality with Heavy-Tailed Spectral Correction
1. TL;DR
2. The "All-Ones" Fallacy: Why Orthogonality Isn't Enough
3. Methodology: The Power of $p$
3.1. Theoretical Depth: Schatten-q Norms
4. Experimental Results: Setting New SOTAs
4.1. Speed vs. Performance: The HTMuon-NS Variant
5. Critical Analysis & Takeaways