How Do Latent Reasoning Methods Perform Under Weak and Strong Supervision?

How Do Latent Reasoning Methods Perform Under Weak and Strong Supervision?

Summary
Problem
Method
Results
Takeaways
Abstract

This paper presents a rigorous internal analysis of <strong>latent reasoning</strong> methods (e.g., Coconut, CODI, CoLaR, SIM-CoT) that perform multi-step computation in continuous hidden spaces. The authors investigate whether these models truly "think" or merely exploit shortcuts, while also evaluating the "Breadth-First Search (BFS)" hypothesis in latent space.

-

Find Similar Papers

Try Our Examples

  • Find recent papers from 2024-2025 focusing on mitigating shortcut learning in implicit or latent chain-of-thought reasoning models.
  • Which study first proposed the Breadth-First Search (BFS) hypothesis for continuous latent reasoning, and how do current empirical findings contradict its theoretical assumptions?
  • Explore research applying latent reasoning or "contemplation tokens" to multi-modal tasks or reinforcement learning to see if shortcut behaviors persist across domains.