How to deal with the revision suggestions given by the journal?

Receiving journal revision suggestions is a normal and addressable part of academic publishing; authors can successfully respond to critique through careful consideration and constructive revision. Handling reviewer comments effectively requires a systematic and professional approach. Begin by comprehensively reading all feedback, distinguishing major critiques concerning methodology or argumentation from minor requests like clarifications or corrections. Prioritize addressing substantive issues that strengthen the paper's validity and impact, ensuring every point raised is acknowledged and either incorporated or politely justified if disagreed with. Maintain a constructive, respectful tone throughout, viewing the process as collaborative improvement. Document all changes meticulously. Implement revisions by organizing comments and systematically planning responses. Develop a point-by-point revision document detailing modifications made (e.g., page/line references) alongside a formal response letter explaining actions taken and rationale for any disagreements. After revising the manuscript accordingly, conduct a final review for consistency and completeness before resubmission. This process enhances the manuscript's quality and increases acceptance likelihood.