How to understand the editorial decision notice of a journal?

An editorial decision notice formally communicates a journal's evaluation outcome regarding a submitted manuscript. It categorically states whether the manuscript is accepted, requires revision, or is rejected. Key principles involve distinguishing between the primary decision categories: rejection, revise and resubmit (major or minor revisions), or acceptance. The notice typically summarizes reviewer and editor comments justifying the decision. Necessary conditions for understanding include carefully parsing the specific requested changes for revisions, noting deadlines for resubmission, and identifying whether further review is required after revision. Crucially, the scope encompasses reviewer feedback and the editor's independent assessment, with adherence to journal policies being paramount. Attention must focus on the rationale provided and any mandatory procedural steps outlined. Upon receipt, first classify the decision level. For rejections, understand the reasons but avoid extensive rebuttal unless invited. For revision requests, meticulously synthesize all reviewer and editor comments, develop a comprehensive revision plan addressing each point, prepare a detailed response letter documenting changes made, and resubmit before any deadline. Prompt resubmission after thorough revision demonstrates professionalism and increases publication prospects. For acceptance, follow any minor final formatting or administrative instructions precisely. Understanding and efficiently acting on the notice optimizes manuscript progression and respects the peer review process.