When using AI-assisted writing, how can the AI-generated rate of articles be controlled?

Controlling the AI-generated rate in AI-assisted writing is achievable through deliberate author oversight and strategic application. It requires conscious choices about the AI's role to ensure the final work reflects substantive human intellectual contribution. Key principles involve clearly defining the division of labor: the human author must retain responsibility for generating the core ideas, arguments, and critical analysis. AI should be employed primarily for specific tasks like overcoming writer's block through initial drafting of sections, improving phrasing, summarizing complex literature, or checking grammar. Crucially, all AI-generated material necessitates rigorous human verification for factual accuracy, logical coherence, and stylistic appropriateness, and must be significantly revised to integrate seamlessly into the author's voice and argument. Over-reliance on AI for critical thinking or unedited text reproduction elevates the AI-generated rate unacceptably. Actual implementation involves establishing a workflow: the human author defines the core structure and key arguments, uses AI selectively for targeted assistance (e.g., drafting a problematic paragraph or suggesting synonyms), then critically edits, rewrites, and synthesizes the output. Citation of key AI contributions may be required depending on institutional policy. The goal is to leverage AI as a support tool to enhance efficiency or clarity while ensuring human authorship dominates the original thought and expression that constitute meaningful scholarly work.