Do autonomous agents actually reduce your workload, or just shift it?
The short answer is that it depends entirely on how the agent is built. In a 2025 study of a human-agent collaborative web navigation system called CowPilot, humans performed only 15.2% of the total steps while the agent handled the rest, and the team achieved a 95% success rate [4]. That means the agent did the heavy lifting — filling forms, navigating pages, clicking buttons — and the human only stepped in for critical decisions or corrections. The key design feature was that the agent proposed next steps, and the human could pause, reject, or override them without having to micromanage every action [4]. This suggests that when agents are designed to be interruptible and transparent, they genuinely reduce visible work rather than creating hidden tasks.
However, a 2023 study of conversational agents in virtual workplaces found a darker side: agents can collect user data, reduce worker autonomy, and foster social isolation, all of which create hidden work in the form of privacy management, loss of control, or emotional labor [2]. The researchers interviewed 15 senior experts in ethics, collaboration, and computer science to derive 14 ethical guidelines for introducing such agents [2]. The takeaway is that hidden work isn't just about extra clicks — it can be psychological or organizational, like having to monitor what the agent does with your data or feeling pressured to keep up with its pace.
About These Sources
This answer is built on 5 peer-reviewed studies — published from 2022 to 2025, 3 from 2024 or later, 2 in Q1 journals — selected as the most relevant from 5 studies that passed quality screening, drawn from 29 papers retrieved from a database of over 500 million.
Sources used in this answer
Simple autonomous agents can enhance creative semantic discovery by human groups
In an experiment with 1,875 participants in 125 networks, simple autonomous agents (bots) that shared the most similar noun improved group creative discovery only when the semantic space was easy to navigate; in harder spaces, they may have added noise rather than reducing it [1].
Ethical Challenges for Human–Agent Interaction in Virtual Collaboration at Work
Through 15 expert interviews, this study identified 14 ethical guidelines for conversational agents in virtual teams, warning that agents can collect user data, reduce worker autonomy, and foster social isolation — all forms of hidden work [2].
Implicitly Aligning Humans and Autonomous Agents through Shared Task Abstractions
The HA² framework, using hierarchical reinforcement learning to mimic human task abstraction, showed statistically significant improvement over existing baselines when paired with unseen agents and humans in the Overcooked environment, reducing the need for humans to adapt to the agent [3].
CowPilot: A Framework for Autonomous and Human-Agent Collaborative Web Navigation
In case studies on five common websites, the CowPilot human-agent collaborative mode achieved a 95% success rate while requiring humans to perform only 15.2% of total steps; even with human interventions, the agent drove up to half of task success on its own [4].
Mediating Agent Reliability with Human Trust, Situation Awareness, and Performance in Autonomously-Collaborative Human-Agent Teams
In a time-pressured continuous pursuit task, reducing agent reliability could generate a more effective agent imperceptibly different from a fully reliable one, and agents with an active stake in team performance offset loss of human situation awareness, reducing hidden cognitive load [5].
