Can circular business models be profitable at commercial scale?

Can circular business models actually make money at scale?

Yes, but the evidence is clear that profitability is not guaranteed—it requires deliberate strategy and often digital tools. A large-scale study of 599 German manufacturing firms found that companies with a strong digital focus were significantly more likely to adopt circular business models profitably, suggesting digitalisation is a key enabler [9]. Another analysis of 21 organisations identified 25 barriers to circular business model innovation, including high financial costs and legal hurdles, but also 10 drivers such as market demand and financial incentives—meaning profitability is possible when these drivers are actively managed [10].

Real-world examples back this up. The French start-up Phenix, which tackles food waste, successfully scaled its circular model by developing three core capabilities: orchestrating an ecosystem of partners, and two types of ambidexterity (balancing efficiency and innovation at both organisational and institutional levels) [2]. Similarly, the luxury fashion brand Elvis & Kresse turned waste fire-hoses into durable, fashionable products and built a profitable brand through its 'rescue–transform–donate' model, showing that circularity can even work in high-end markets [8].

However, profitability varies by sector and business type. For start-ups, market and financial factors are the main drivers, while established firms face more organisational and market barriers [10]. A review of 381 academic papers found that most circular business model research focuses on electronics, energy, fashion, and food, with limited cross-sector generalisability—meaning what works in one industry may not work in another [6].

What conditions make circular business models profitable?

Profitability at scale depends on three key conditions: ecosystem collaboration, digital integration, and supportive policies. A study of nine Swedish biogas companies found that circular business models often fail when analysed in isolation—instead, success requires a 'circular business ecosystem' where multiple stakeholders coordinate closely, especially when value chain integration is low [4]. This means companies cannot go it alone; they need partnerships across the supply chain.

Digital tools are a major accelerator. The German manufacturing study showed that firms with strong digital focus were more likely to profit from circular models, because digitalisation enables tracking, reverse logistics, and new service-based offerings [9]. In fashion, digital transformation is helping companies implement circular practices like 'deliver functionality rather than ownership' (e.g., rental models) and 'create value from waste' [7].

Policy and institutional support also matter. The Phenix case highlighted that institutional factors—like regulations on food waste—shaped opportunities to design and scale profitable models [2]. A review of green entrepreneurship found that while circular businesses enjoy cost savings, brand reputation, and long-term profitability, challenges like scalability, consumer awareness, and access to financing remain, underscoring the need for policy support and industry collaboration [5].

Which businesses benefit most—and which struggle?

Start-ups and digitally native firms tend to benefit more from circular models than traditional incumbents. A study of British circular start-ups found they can achieve competitive advantage by serving nature, future generations, and society while maintaining financial profitability—but they face distinctive implementation challenges, such as limited resources and value chain hurdles [1]. In contrast, established companies are more susceptible to market and organisational barriers when trying to transform their existing linear models [10].

Sector matters enormously. In small-scale chicken farming in Vietnam, only 59% of flocks achieved a positive return on investment, with feed costs eating up nearly half of total costs—showing that circular principles like waste reduction are not enough if basic economics are unfavourable [3]. Meanwhile, luxury fashion has successfully integrated circularity, as seen in the Elvis & Kresse case, where waste materials were turned into high-value products [8]. A review of sustainable luxury fashion concluded that transitioning from linear to circular models can benefit the environment, employees, and communities, but implementation remains challenging in mature markets [11].

The bottom line: circular business models are profitable at scale for companies that invest in digital capabilities, build strong partnerships, and operate in supportive regulatory environments. But for small, resource-constrained firms or those in sectors with thin margins, profitability is harder to achieve without external support [6][10].

Sources used in this answer

Related research questions