WisPaper
WisPaper
Search
Assistant
Pricing
TrueCite

Is formula feeding associated with higher infection rates in infants?

Yes, formula feeding is linked to higher infection rates in infants. Evidence from multiple studies shows increased risks of gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, and sepsis compared to breastfeeding.

Direct answer

Yes, formula feeding is associated with higher infection rates in infants. Multiple studies show that formula-fed infants have significantly more infections than breastfed infants. For example, one study found formula-fed infants had nearly 9 times higher odds of acute gastroenteritis [4], and another showed a 69% higher load of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in their guts [8]. Across the evidence here, the pattern is consistent: breastfeeding is protective against infections, while formula feeding increases risk, especially for gastrointestinal and respiratory illnesses.

8sources cited

This article was generated with WisPaper-powered search and paper analysis.

Does formula feeding really increase infection risk?

Yes, the evidence is clear and consistent: formula feeding is linked to higher rates of several types of infections in infants. A 2025 case-control study of 130 infants found that those exclusively formula-fed had 8.86 times higher odds of developing acute gastroenteritis (severe diarrhea and vomiting) compared to exclusively breastfed infants, while mixed feeding (breast plus formula) carried 2.87 times higher odds [4]. Similarly, a 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 studies involving nearly 90,000 preterm or low birth weight infants found that formula feeding increased the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (a devastating gut infection) by nearly 3-fold (odds ratio 2.99) [2]. Another study tracking 103 infants found that formula-fed infants had significantly higher rates of acute respiratory viral infections (78.3% vs. 17.9% in breastfed infants) [5]. These findings converge from different study designs and populations, strengthening the conclusion that formula feeding raises infection risk.

Why does formula feeding lead to more infections?

The link between formula feeding and infections is driven by several biological mechanisms. First, formula lacks the antibodies, immune cells, and prebiotics found in breast milk that directly protect infants. Second, formula feeding alters the infant gut microbiome in ways that promote harmful bacteria. A 2021 study of 180 infants found that formula-fed babies had 69% more antibiotic resistance genes in their gut bacteria, along with higher levels of opportunistic pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae [8]. They also had significantly fewer beneficial Bifidobacteria, which are key for immune development [5][8]. Third, formula feeding is associated with changes in the gut lining that may make it easier for pathogens to invade. A 2024 study showed that formula-fed infants had a different gut microbiome composition, with more Enterococcus (a potential pathogen) and less Akkermansia (a beneficial bacterium) [5]. These microbiome changes create an environment more susceptible to infections.

Are there any exceptions or caveats?

While the overall pattern is clear, some nuances exist. For example, a 2022 study from the Amazon found that prolonged breastfeeding (≥12 months) reduced the risk of malaria infection by nearly 80% [6], showing breastfeeding's protective effect extends to parasitic infections. However, a 2023 study on cytomegalovirus (CMV) found that breastfeeding actually increased CMV transmission (62.6% vs. 29.9% in formula-fed infants), but importantly, this infection did not cause any adverse health effects in term or moderately preterm infants [7]. This highlights that not all infections transmitted via breast milk are harmful. Additionally, in the context of HIV, a 2022 trial in Botswana found that formula feeding prevented HIV transmission more effectively than breastfeeding with zidovudine prophylaxis, but formula feeding was associated with higher infant mortality at 7 months (9.3% vs. 4.9%) [3]. This underscores that in settings with poor sanitation, the infection risks of formula feeding can outweigh its benefits. Finally, a 2025 study on probiotics in preterm infants found that probiotics reduced mortality but did not significantly lower late-onset sepsis rates [1], suggesting that simply adding probiotics to formula may not fully close the infection gap.

About These Sources

This answer is built on 8 peer-reviewed studies — published from 2021 to 2025, 3 from 2024 or later, 2 in Q1 journals, collectively cited 149 times — selected as the most relevant from 15 studies that passed quality screening, drawn from 71 papers retrieved from a database of over 500 million.

Sources used in this answer

1

Effectiveness and Risks of Probiotics in Preterm Infants

In a large cohort of preterm infants (n=32,667), probiotics reduced mortality but did not significantly lower rates of necrotizing enterocolitis or late-onset sepsis; probiotic sepsis was rare (1.4 per 1,000 infants).

2

Mother's Own Milk Compared With Formula Milk for Feeding Preterm or Low Birth Weight Infants: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 studies (89,638 preterm/low birth weight infants) found formula feeding increased the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (OR 2.99) but had little effect on all-cause mortality or infection overall.

3

Breastfeeding plus infant zidovudine prophylaxis for 6 months vs formula feeding plus infant zidovudine for 1 month to reduce mother-to-child HIV transmission in Botswana: a randomized trial: the Mashi Study.

In a randomized trial in Botswana (n=1,200 HIV-positive mothers), formula feeding prevented HIV transmission better than breastfeeding with zidovudine, but formula-fed infants had higher mortality at 7 months (9.3% vs. 4.9%).

4

Association between Acute Gastroenteritis and Type of Feeding in Infants up to 6 Months of Age: A Comparative Study of Breast Feeding, Formula Feeding and Mixed Feeding in CMH Abbottabad

A case-control study of 130 infants found exclusive formula feeding was associated with 8.86 times higher odds of acute gastroenteritis compared to exclusive breastfeeding; mixed feeding had 2.87 times higher odds.

5

Impact of the method of delivery and feeding practice on the gut microbiome of infants in the postnatal period

In a study of 103 infants, formula-fed infants had lower Bifidobacteria and higher Enterococcus in their gut microbiomes, and significantly higher rates of acute respiratory viral infections (78.3% vs. 17.9% in breastfed).

6

Prolonged Breastfeeding and the Risk of Plasmodium vivax Infection and Clinical Malaria in Early Childhood: A Birth Cohort Study

In a Brazilian birth cohort (n=435), prolonged breastfeeding (≥12 months) reduced the risk of Plasmodium vivax infection by 79.8% in early childhood.

7

Minimal adverse outcomes of postnatal cytomegalovirus infection in term or moderate and late preterm infants

Breastfeeding increased postnatal CMV infection (62.6% vs. 29.9% in formula-fed), but the infection did not affect growth or liver enzymes in term or moderately preterm infants.

8

Early-life formula feeding is associated with infant gut microbiota alterations and an increased antibiotic resistance load

In a study of 180 infants, formula-fed neonates had 69% more antibiotic resistance genes in their gut microbiomes and higher levels of opportunistic pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae.