how is reality not real?

Why can reality feel unreal even when it is not?

Your sense of what is real depends heavily on perception, and perception can be fooled. In virtual reality, researchers describe two key illusions: Place Illusion, the feeling of actually being in the virtual place, and Plausibility, the feeling that the virtual events are really happening [4]. Crucially, these illusions work even when the person knows for sure they are illusions [4]. That means the feeling of reality is not the same as reality itself; it is a constructed experience that can be triggered by convincing cues.

Augmented reality goes further by mixing virtual objects into your ordinary visual field [1]. Instead of replacing the world, it adds to it, so what you see is a blend of physical and digital elements. This can make it harder to tell where the digital ends and the physical begins, which is why philosophers worry about new forms of distraction, deception, and disagreement about what is real [1].

Does philosophy say reality is not real?

Philosophy often questions the nature of reality rather than denying it outright. One philosophical view suggests that art can be more real than reality, pointing to an ambiguous relationship in which reality does not simply refer to itself [3]. This is not a scientific claim that the world is fake; it is a way of asking whether our access to reality is always mediated by something else, like imagination or representation.

Other theoretical work proposes new frameworks for understanding reality without claiming it is an illusion. One theory reinterprets the temporal structure of spacetime as possibly being a projection of a deeper geometry, but it explicitly treats this as a hypothesis requiring experimental validation [2]. Another paper explores truth as a continuous process and existence as a pattern, but it does not argue that reality is unreal [5]. So the philosophical and theoretical literature raises questions about reality's nature, but it does not provide evidence that reality is not real.

What does this mean for the question?

The evidence points to a distinction between reality itself and our experience of it. Virtual and augmented technologies can create powerful illusions that make digital elements feel real or make virtual places feel present [1][4]. These illusions are real experiences, but they are not evidence that the physical world is unreal. They show that our sense of reality is flexible and can be augmented or replaced by technology.

Philosophical and theoretical papers question how we know reality and propose new models of it, but they do not claim that reality is simply not real [2][3][5]. Instead, they suggest that our understanding of reality may be incomplete or mediated. So the short answer is: reality is not shown to be unreal; rather, our perception of it can be simulated, augmented, or philosophically questioned.

Sources used in this answer

Related research questions