Designing for the Other ‘Hereafter’: normalising Forgetting in an Ageing World

Designing for the Other 'Hereaer': When Older Adults Remember about Forgeing

2016-05-07
Laura Ramos, Elise Van Den Hoven, Laurie Miller
Summary
Problem
Method
Results
Takeaways
Abstract

This paper explores how older adults perceive and manage "everyday forgetting" through a qualitative study of 18 independent-living seniors. It identifies a critical "internal tension" between the inevitability of memory lapses and their impact on self-identity, proposing design principles to normalize forgetting rather than just preventing it.

TL;DR

While the tech industry is obsessed with "never forgetting," this paper argues that for older adults, the experience of forgetting is an emotional minefield. By studying 18 seniors, the researchers found that acknowledging memory lapses creates a fundamental conflict with one's sense of self. The study suggests we should stop building just "reminders" and start designing "forgetting-friendly" environments that use humor, mundane objects, and mindfulness to reduce the stigma of aging.

The "Hereafter" Moment: Why Current Tech Fails Seniors

In the context of this paper, the "hereafter" isn't a religious reference—it's that common, frustrating experience of walking into a room and wondering: "What am I here after?"

Most Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research views memory as a database problem: if a user forgets, just provide a notification. However, the authors argue this is "solving for the what" while ignoring the "why" and "how it feels." For an older adult, every alarm is a cold reminder of a declining faculty. This creates a stereotype threat where negative assumptions about failing cognition actually compromise the user's performance and self-worth.

Methodology: Peering into Everyday Lapses

The researchers combined diary studies with focus groups to capture what they call "Everyday Forgetting." They categorized lapses into:

  • Prospective Memory: Forgetting future intentions (e.g., missed pills).
  • Retrospective Memory: Forgetting the past (names, words like "asparagus").
  • Attention Lapses: Mind-wandering (e.g., putting an ashtray in the sink instead of a coffee cup).

Methodology: Participant Materials Above: The participant pack used to sensitize seniors to their own forgetting patterns.

The Psychological Conflict: Remembering about Forgetting

The most striking finding was the Internal Tension. Participants often used a Likert scale to rate forgetting as "neutral" (3/5), but their verbal descriptions were filled with "annoyance," "guilt," and "embarrassment."

The paper connects this to Autonoetic Consciousness—the idea that our memories support our self-belief. When a senior forgets a name, it doesn't just lose them a word; it threatens the "coherence of the self." To cope, many participants used humor or trivialized the events as "silly little things" to protect their identity.

From Reminders to Resentment-Free Design

The study observed that seniors are actually masters of mundane hacks. They don't use phone alarms; they use "special places."

  • The China Dish: A specific bowl by the door for keys.
  • Visual Prompts: Putting a canvas bag on a chair to remember tomorrow's errands.

Everyday Memory Hacks Above: Users prefer physical, low-tech interventions like "special places" over complex digital apps.

Strategic Recommendations for Academic and Tech Designers

  1. Exploit Mundane Materials: Instead of stand-alone apps, embed digital cues into everyday objects (the "special places" mentioned above).
  2. Acknowledge and Normalize: Systems should offer a "Forget It/OK" button for tasks, allowing users to consciously let go of overloaded schedules without guilt.
  3. Discrete Personalization: Memory aids must be "hidden" to avoid the social stigma of "needing help," respecting the user's vulnerability.

Conclusion

This work shifts the focus from memory as a computer function to memory as a human experience. As we age, forgetting is inevitable. The goal of design shouldn't be to create a "perfect" digital memory, but to make the inevitable "hereafter" moments a bit more liveable, humorous, and humane.

Find Similar Papers

Try Our Examples

  • Search for recent HCI papers (post-2020) that explore "design for forgetting" or "judicious forgetting" in the context of digital legacy and aging.
  • Which studies first established the "Self-Memory System" (SMS) theory by Conway, and how has it been applied to interaction design for the elderly?
  • What are the latest SOTA methods for "ambient reminder systems" that integrate digital interfaces into mundane physical objects for dementia support?
Contents
Designing for the Other ‘Hereafter’: normalising Forgetting in an Ageing World
1. TL;DR
2. The "Hereafter" Moment: Why Current Tech Fails Seniors
3. Methodology: Peering into Everyday Lapses
4. The Psychological Conflict: Remembering about Forgetting
5. From Reminders to Resentment-Free Design
6. Strategic Recommendations for Academic and Tech Designers
7. Conclusion