How can one maintain contact with the editor during the review process of a journal?

Maintaining appropriate contact with the journal editor during peer review is feasible and often necessary, primarily conducted through the journal's manuscript submission system. Communication should be professional, purposeful, and respectful of editorial timelines and processes. Contact the editor directly via the journal's online portal messaging system when absolutely necessary, such as to clarify an editorial decision, inquire about unusually extended delays beyond stated review periods, or to provide crucial updates or corrections not possible within the portal. Ensure all communication is concise, polite, and addresses substantive issues directly related to the manuscript's processing; avoid unnecessary status checks or repeated inquiries. Always adhere strictly to the specific journal's communicated guidelines regarding communication frequency and method. Primarily use the system's messaging function for all correspondence. Contact may be appropriate when seeking clarification on reviewer comments requiring editorial input, requesting a deadline extension for revisions with valid justification, reporting potential conflicts discovered post-submission, or escalating serious concerns about the review process itself (e.g., perceived bias). Always allow reasonable time for responses, typically several working days. Such focused communication ensures the process remains efficient and addresses genuine needs without burdening editorial staff.