Will the journal provide me with feedback after submission?

Journal editorial procedures commonly involve providing feedback to authors during the peer review stage. Receiving feedback after initial submission is generally feasible, though it is not guaranteed for every submission and depends significantly on the journal's specific process and editorial decision. Feedback typically emerges during peer review, where independent experts assess the manuscript's contribution, methodology, and clarity. The nature and depth of feedback vary considerably, ranging from comprehensive reviewer comments to brief editorial notes explaining the decision. Key factors influencing feedback receipt include the journal's standard policy, whether the paper progresses beyond initial editorial triage, and the thoroughness of the assigned reviewers. Not all desk-rejected submissions receive detailed critiques, and feedback mainly accompanies manuscripts advanced to formal peer review. Authors should consult the specific journal's guidelines for clarity on their review process stages and communication policies. Receiving constructive peer review feedback is highly valuable, offering authors insights to strengthen their manuscript's rigor and presentation for potential resubmission to the same or another journal, thereby enhancing the manuscript's ultimate contribution and impact within the scholarly discourse.