How to communicate with reviewers during the journal review process?

Effective communication with journal reviewers primarily occurs indirectly through the editor, utilizing formal written responses to reviewer comments submitted alongside the revised manuscript. Direct contact with reviewers is generally not permitted or advisable. Adhere strictly to the journal's specified communication protocols, typically managed via the online submission system through the editor. Carefully address every reviewer point comprehensively and respectfully in a point-by-point rebuttal letter, providing clear, evidence-based justifications for changes or disagreements. Maintain a professional, objective, and constructive tone throughout; acknowledge valid critiques graciously and avoid defensiveness. Always direct responses through the editor, refraining from contacting reviewers directly unless explicitly instructed otherwise by the editorial office. The core implementation involves drafting a detailed response document. Systematically list each reviewer comment verbatim, followed by a precise reply stating whether it was implemented and describing the specific change made (citing page/line numbers where possible), or explaining the reasoned rationale for disagreement. Clearly indicate significant revisions in the manuscript, often using tracked changes or highlighting. Submit the point-by-point response letter, the revised manuscript, and sometimes a 'clean' manuscript copy to the editor through the journal portal. This structured process demonstrates scholarly diligence, increases the likelihood of acceptance, and upholds professional standards in scholarly discourse.