How to post peer review feedback on academic social platforms?

Posting peer review feedback on academic social platforms involves publicly sharing your constructive critique of a scholarly manuscript, typically anonymized and shared after the journal's review process concludes, if permitted by the journal's policy. This practice facilitates transparent scholarly discussion but requires careful consideration of confidentiality and ethical guidelines. Crucially, respect the journal's embargo policies and manuscript confidentiality; never share details before the paper's publication unless explicitly allowed. Focus on constructive, evidence-based critiques rather than personal remarks. Anonymize your feedback unless the platform and journal policy specifically endorse open, attributed reviews. Ensure your commentary adheres to professional norms and contributes positively to the scholarly discourse, avoiding disclosure of any privileged editorial information. To implement this, first confirm the target journal's stance on sharing reviewer comments publicly. Choose a suitable platform (e.g., PubPeer). Prepare your feedback by removing any identifying personal details and ensuring it summarizes the key constructive points addressed to the scholarly community, not just the original authors. Clearly state the context (e.g., "Feedback based on a review for Journal X"). Post the anonymized commentary and be prepared to engage professionally in follow-up discussions. This practice enhances transparency and allows your insights to benefit the wider research community.