How to find suitable peer reviewers in a journal?

Finding suitable peer reviewers involves editorial teams systematically identifying experts with relevant qualifications and objectivity. This process ensures rigorous manuscript evaluation while maintaining academic integrity. Selection requires matching reviewer expertise to the manuscript's subject matter, verified through publication records and institutional affiliations. Reviewers must demonstrate impartiality, with no conflicts of interest (COI) involving authors or funding sources. Geographic and demographic diversity strengthens perspectives. Journals primarily leverage academic databases, institutional networks, and author suggestions. Editorial team knowledge and reviewer performance history further guide selections. Actual implementation begins by analyzing the manuscript’s discipline and methodology to define required expertise. Consult specialized databases (e.g., PubMed, Web of Science) and journal submission systems for potential candidates. Verify qualifications via ORCID profiles and recent publications. Explicitly check for COI using institutional affiliations, co-author history, and funding acknowledgments. Extend invitations with clear scope and deadline information, tracking response rates and review quality for future reference. This systematic approach enhances review validity and publication timeliness.