Will the format requirements of a journal affect the probability of a manuscript being accepted?

Journal format requirements significantly influence a manuscript's acceptance probability, albeit indirectly and rarely as the sole determinant of rejection. Non-compliance risks creating a negative initial impression and can hinder the review process. Adherence demonstrates professionalism and respect for the journal’s guidelines, streamlining the editorial assessment. Significant deviations can distract reviewers, create unnecessary friction during production preparation, or even suggest disregard for instructions. While core scientific validity is paramount, formatting errors may disproportionately impact borderline submissions undergoing close scrutiny. Ultimately, rejection due *solely* to minor formatting is uncommon, yet consistent neglect can prejudice the review. The potential negative effect varies with the journal’s strictness and the extent of non-compliance. Proper formatting facilitates efficient peer review, allowing reviewers and editors to focus on scientific merit without distraction. It expedites the path to publication if accepted and signals author diligence. For journals, it ensures consistency, maintains quality standards, and reduces production workload. Ensuring compliance is a fundamental step towards optimising acceptance chances by presenting the research effectively within established protocols.